Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Ask all your technical questions about the TCG here, card effects, rulings and rules.

Moderator: Ryoma_Echizen

Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Postby BajulaBlitzSlain » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:20 am

Bluum Erkis, Flare Guardian

Whenever this creature would break one of your opponent's shields, your opponent shows that shield to you instead of putting it into his hand. If it's a spell that has "Shield Trigger" you cast it for no cost, then put it into your opponent's graveyard. If it's not, your opponent puts it into his hand.

Official Wizard's Ruling:-
Q: Bluum Erkis would break a shield, and it's Boomerang Comet. This is a spell that has "shield trigger" that says "Return a card from your mana zone to your hand. After you cast this spell, put it into your mana zone instead of your graveyard." What happens?
A: You cast Boomerang Comet. You return a card from your mana zone to your hand. Then you put Boomerang Comet into your opponent's graveyard because that's what Bluum Erkis tells you to do. Since you were never going to put Boomerang Comet into your graveyard, its effect that says to put it into your mana zone instead of your graveyard doesn't apply.

Pixie Cocoon
[Shield Trigger]
Return a creature from your mana zone to your hand. After you cast this spell, put it into your mana zone.


Pixie Cocoon has no clause which tells me to put it in my mana zone instead of my graveyard. So as far as i know, i get a choice between putting it into my opponent's graveyard (Bluum's ability) and putting it into my mana zone(Pixie Cocoon's ability).

i may be completely wrong but i believe this boils down to this: Who owns the ability of Pixie Cocoon? The card owner or the player casting it. Must i put Pixie into my mana if Bluum broke the shield?
Image Image
User avatar
BajulaBlitzSlain
Steel Paladin
Steel Paladin
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:05 am
Location: INDIA

Re: Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Postby Nerafim » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:06 pm

Lol that's just a logical trap really. You do the same with Pixie as with Comet.

For one the fact that it doesn't say "instead of graveyard" does not matter as that is very implied. They just don't bother adding that anymore because people should get it already.

Second of all, that wording should have made Pixie Cocoon a Charger Spell as it's the exact same wording. And I am pretty damn sure you can't send other Chargers Spells to your mana due to Bluum.

Bluum's "send card to grave" is the kind of ruling that overwrites everything like this, because that's why it was put there in the first place. And those are just the rulings for the English game, which are weaker.
Image
From teh awesomeness I come...
User avatar
Nerafim
Leader of the Zephyr Knights
Leader of the Zephyr Knights
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:43 am
Location: Tranzovanya

Re: Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Postby MIAR » Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:55 am

But its good isn't it?
Image
"I am a warrior who is free to be a hero"
HAHA DIE
See the power of the most powerful warrior of all time
User avatar
MIAR
Leader of the Destruction Enforcers
Leader of the Destruction Enforcers
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:41 am
Location: kolkata,india

Re: Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Postby Nerafim » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:15 pm

MIAR wrote:But its good isn't it?


What is that question even adressed to? Do you realize how inspid and spam-like it is?
Image
From teh awesomeness I come...
User avatar
Nerafim
Leader of the Zephyr Knights
Leader of the Zephyr Knights
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:43 am
Location: Tranzovanya

Re: Bluum Erkis vs Pixie Cocoon

Postby MIAR » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:32 pm

Sorry really sorry.I am ashamed of myself
Image
"I am a warrior who is free to be a hero"
HAHA DIE
See the power of the most powerful warrior of all time
User avatar
MIAR
Leader of the Destruction Enforcers
Leader of the Destruction Enforcers
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:41 am
Location: kolkata,india


Return to Rules and Rulings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest